Programme rescue
When a technology programme goes wrong, we help you get it back on track.
Over budget, over time, over-promised or under-delivered. Senior people step in, find out what is really happening, and tell you honestly what to do next.
Programme rescue
Over budget, over time, over-promised or under-delivered. Senior people step in, find out what is really happening, and tell you honestly what to do next.
01 The short answer
Artimus programme rescue steps into over-budget, late or under-delivering technology programmes to get them back on track. Senior people review the plan, code, architecture, supplier contract and team, stop the damage, re-anchor the work on the business outcome, and tell you honestly whether to fix, rebuild or stop. Then we run the recovery and step back.
Rescue is where the fractional model earns its keep. You need a lot of senior attention for a short time, then much less. We dial up while we stabilise and dial down as the programme recovers. Only pay for what you need, when you need it.
02 Our method
Three stages, run by senior people, each ending in a clear decision you can see and question.
Stop the damage and get the facts.
DecisionWhat to protect, and what to stop now.
Re-anchor the work on the business outcome.
DecisionFix, rebuild or stop.
Run the recovery, then step back.
DecisionWhen it is safe to step back.
03 Reframe
The most valuable thing in a rescue is an honest decision. We make it on evidence, and we put the reasons in writing.
04 Why Artimus for rescue
We have been brought in after another supplier or team has not delivered. We know how to walk into a low-trust situation and get to the facts quickly.
The people who review your programme are the people who run the recovery. Everyone who works on your engagement is named in your statement of work.
We tell you honestly whether to fix, rebuild or stop, and why. Our bench builds production systems, so the advice is grounded in what delivery really takes.
Heavy senior attention while we stabilise, then less as the programme recovers. One lead, one contract, and specialists only when the work needs them.
If the date has moved more than once, releases keep breaking things, or you cannot see what the money has bought, it is worth an independent look. An early review shows where things stand before another quarter of drift, and sometimes the answer is that the programme is fine.
Not automatically. Many programmes recover with the existing supplier once scope, ownership and checkpoints are fixed. We review the supplier contract and the team during stabilise, and recommend keeping, changing or supplementing them on the evidence, not on blame.
Only if that is the honest answer. Rebuilding is expensive and risky, so we look first for what can be kept. When a rebuild is right, we carry forward what you have already paid to learn: the requirements, the data, the designs and any parts that work.
It matters a great deal. Early in stabilise we check who owns the code, the data, the cloud accounts and the domains, and whether the work could move to another team tomorrow. If it could not, securing that access is one of the first actions.
Both. We can advise while your team and suppliers deliver, or run the recovery ourselves with senior engineers from our bench. A rescue can mix the two, and the mix changes as the programme recovers. You only pay for what you need, when you need it.
A sponsor who owns the business outcome, access to the people, code, documents and supplier contract, and candour about what has happened so far. We keep the review confidential and focused on facts.
We reply by email
Tell us where you are and where you want to get to, and we will tell you honestly whether we are the right fit, and what you actually need.
Thank you. We will be in touch.
Your message is with us. A senior member of the team will reply by email.